Shrinking and enlarging are not opposites
Resizing is safe in one direction only. Shrinking throws away information that exists; enlarging invents information that does not. Both are one-way, but they are one-way in different ways.
What actually happens to the pixels
| Action | What happens | Going back |
|---|---|---|
| Shrinking | Several pixels are averaged into one | What was discarded does not return |
| Enlarging | Missing pixels are guessed from their neighbours | The guesses stay |
Shrink and then enlarge again and you do not get the original back — you get a soft copy of it. Keeping the original is the only way around that.
What unlocking the ratio means
With the aspect ratio kept, one number is enough and the other follows. Unlocked, both numbers are used exactly as typed — necessary when fitting a fixed frame, and otherwise the way people end up stretched sideways.
Pixel size and print size are different questions
"Make it 10cm wide" may be a question about density rather than about pixels. To keep every pixel and change only how large it prints, the DPI converter does that. The print DPI guide has the difference in full.
What this tool holds to
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Smallest edge | 1px |
| Largest edge | 8192px |
| Output format | The same as the source |
| Original metadata | Gone — the image is encoded again |
Keeping the format is deliberate. Changing size and format on one screen makes it impossible to tell which of them spoiled the result. If format is the goal, the format converter is the tool.
Back to PrismMesh